Survey reveals future of housing market in swing states

Is the future generation of homeowners set up to fail? 

Ahead of the upcoming U.S. presidential election, a new study of 1,000 adults from the seven swing states found 61% of parents polled are worried about whether their children will be able to buy a home as they get older.

Over the past five years, 80% of adults in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin have seen housing prices increase in their state, averaging a 33% increase. 

Arizona has seen the steepest housing cost increase at 38%, while Wisconsin saw the least (27%). 

The research, commissioned by Built, (https://www.getbuilt.com) a real estate and construction finance and management platform, and conducted by Talker Research, revealed 58% believe it is harder to find a home today than it was five years ago. It was found to be especially difficult for those polled who are living in Arizona (63%) and Nevada (63%). 

And many believe it’s been caused by overall inflation (59%), rent increases (40%), interest rate increases (31%), not enough residential housing being available (28%), and increased property tax rates (28%).

Nearly half (46%) of homeowners said they were dissatisfied with current mortgage rates, with dissatisfaction reaching a high of 48% in Michigan and Georgia. 

Respondents were asked whether they feel various levels of government are taking adequate responsibility in addressing housing issues. Nearly a third (30%) believe their city government is doing enough. 

However, many think more action is needed at different levels of government: 48% feel their city could do more, 53% believe their state should step up, and 57% say the federal government isn’t doing enough.

“With housing affordability top of mind for voters, political candidates won’t be able to sidestep the pressure to deliver real, actionable solutions,” said Built CEO Chase Gilbert. “With 10% of all U.S. residential construction spend managed on our platform, we have a front-row seat to the factors speeding up housing development nationwide. 

“As voters head to the polls, especially in key swing states, housing will be a pivotal issue. The right combination of tools and policies can break down barriers, ensuring homes get built faster and more efficiently to meet the growing demand.”

Respondents were also asked whether they were in favor or were against certain policies proposed from the two major party presidential candidates.

The results of the survey reveal broad support for both major candidates’ housing policies, with stronger majorities backing Vice President Harris’ initiatives. 

A 67% majority supports Harris’ proposal for a $25,000 first-time homebuyer grant, with only 19% opposed, and 58% favor the construction of 3 million new housing units, while just 18% oppose this plan.

In contrast, former President Trump’s housing policies face more division among respondents. Forty-two percent  support the idea of opening federal lands for large-scale housing construction, but a significant 31% oppose it. 

Similarly, 52% of respondents are in favor of banning mortgages for undocumented civilians, though 20% oppose this policy

Within their local elections, 51% believe an incoming, challenger candidate could do a better job addressing housing issues than the current incumbent.

Respondents shared which housing policies they would be in favor of if it were put into action in their local area: rent control (47%), caps on rent increases (45%), multi-family housing in single-family zones (26%), and increased residential development (26%).

Potential voters in each state shared just how much of an impact they believe the current presidential election will have on the housing market for them.

Over half of respondents from Georgia (54%) and Michigan (51%) said the results of the presidential election will have a “major impact” for them. Meanwhile, 40% of North Carolina and Wisconsin residents agreed it will have a “moderate” impact for them.

Pennsylvania was the least concerned — 28% said the election has “little to no” impact on their state’s housing market.

“During an election year, the spotlight on policies and promises sharpens,” said Gilbert. “Housing costs are front and center for millions of Americans, and rightly so. The past five years have forced many to rethink their cost of living and whether homeownership is even within reach anymore — no matter which side of the aisle they’re on.”